Open/Close Menu وکیل | مشاوره رایگان | وکالت | وکیل آنلاین

President Joe Biden on Wednesday He repeated a claim About the second supplement that some of us have He was repeatedly challenged as inaccurate. President Biden reiterated that “the Second Amendment is not absolute” and argued that certain weapons were prohibited at the time of the passage of the Second Amendment. This is simply incorrect.

The statement that the Second Complement is not absolute is definitely true. There are laws that can be enacted within the limits set by the Supreme Court. However, As discussed in one columnPresident Biden continues to ignore constitutional restrictions in blaming gun lobbies and political dissidents for the deaths.

President Biden also reiterated his claim that some weapons would be banned at the time of the passage of the Second Amendment.

Biden had previously stated:

And I can add: the Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could have a gun and the type of weapon you could have. “You could not buy a ball.”

President Biden reiterated a false claim this week that many of us have corrected in the past.

President Biden reiterated his false claim that early Americans could not buy cannons when he announced new rules for so-called “ghost guns” and other measures.

“Anyway – it seems strange – I support the Second Amendment. But from the beginning the Second Amendment did not say that you can have as many guns as you want, as much as you want. You could not have one. Buy the ball, while in fact the second amendment was approved.

It seems strange because it is real and legally incorrect. I have been contacting the media about this claim for years and it does not improve with repetition. It even has the Washington Post Announced Biden’s understanding of the Second Amendment is incorrect.

However, this week, President Biden remained frustrated and uninformed“The Second Complement is not absolute. Once approved, you could not have a cannon, you could not have certain types of weapons. “There have always been restrictions.”

Again, when the Second Amendment was passed, there was no federal law banning ball possession. Gun laws remained a local issue, and I do not know of any restrictions on cannons or other types of rifles until much later in our history. Early local laws governed secret weapons, although secret cannons were not part of the provisions.

In fact, the constitution itself protects private ball possession over private individuals. Article 1, Section 8, paragraph 11 allows Congress to grant “mark letters and retaliation.” Which allowed private parties on the high seas with. . . Balls (recently Some members of Congress wanted to issue such letters to Marco Recruit private individuals in the fight against Russia).

As with Non-acceptance of restrictions on the range of legislative options Because of the support for the Second Amendment, President Biden is undermining efforts to reach common ground with this repeated false claim. If we are to achieve what the president calls “reasonable” responses to this massacre, we must begin with a common understanding of the constitutional and historical foundations of such reforms.

Write a comment:


Your email address will not be published.