In accordance with reportsIlan Musk is now expected to take over as interim CEO of Twitter as soon as his purchase is finalized. This is good news because buying Twitter may be a mere conflict compared to the upcoming battle. Political forces in the United States and abroad are working together to resist his efforts to restore freedom of expression on social media.
If history has shown one thing, it is that losing a salary is easier than getting it back. Masks are in demand, but neither governments nor many of their employees are willing to sell them. If the mask is to live up to its commitment, it must take five specific steps to protect freedom of expression. Given the allied interests against him, Musk must move quickly if he is to not only promote freedom of expression on Twitter.
1. Accept the standard of the First Amendment.
Experts and politicians, including former President Joe Biden and former President Barack Obama, have justified their demands for censorship (or “content moderation” for reputable corporations) by emphasizing that the first amendment applies only to government, not private corporations. Have. This distinction allows Obama Declare yourself Last week was “very close to an absolutist First Amendment.” He does not call himself an “absolute freedom of expression” because he advocates censorship of views that he considers “false,” “misinformation,” or “prostitution.”
Distinction has always been an dishonest dodge. The First Amendment is not the sole or exclusive definition of freedom of expression. Censorship on social media is just as harmful, if not more so, to freedom of expression. However, Mask can call this a bluff. He could instruct Twitter to apply the standard of the First Amendment, which applies to the government to speak in a public forum. By doing so, the mask immediately removes most of the censorship applied to the site. However, he should make it clear that the standards of “government speech” (which allows for more speech regulations) will not apply. Twitter as “Digital Square of the cityWhich has been embraced for a long time.
2. Rebuild Twitter.
When a new standard is set, the mask must specify how it will be implemented. This requires breaking the vast censorship bureaucracy on Twitter that starts from the top. This move is now likely as evident in Tearful remarks by Vijaya GadehThe head of Twitter’s Legal, Policy and Trust department tells his staff this week. Gad, Like Parag Agrawal, Twitter CEO، For him, freedom of expression is notorious in society Censorship historyIncluding his role in banning Donald Trump and the New York Post story on Hunter Biden. Holding the position of CEO and immediate removal of such figures will have an immediate impact. However, the new measures should include the release of algorithms and, ultimately, the achievement of transparency in Twitter content decisions. This should also include complete accounting of any tools that have been used in the past to control online discussions, including Acceleration Or Prohibit shadows.
3. Change from site modification to individual filters.
Acceptance of the standard of the first amendment is not complete. This is a private site that can be used for a variety of posts ranging from copyright and trademark infringement to privacy breaches and criminal threats. In addition, many sites prohibit the use of racist or offensive language in comments. This is necessary because all readers are exposed to the comments section. Twitter is different. It can adopt a general platform of freedom of expression while allowing individuals to apply specific filters to avoid racist or offensive language. Freedom of expression includes the right of readers to choose what they read. The key point is that the decision can be left to the readers instead of being imposed by the company. As you can get away from the city square speakers, you can choose what you read. You can also choose to read more. Twitter can leave such decisions to the consumer.
4. Stay away from advertising revenue.
The next campaign is predictable. Liberals are likely to target advertisers for boycotting Twitter. Fans have already shown that they can beat companies to succumb to such campaigns. Many are worried that the mask will prove right that consumers still want more freedom Campaigns of companies like Facebook To force them to accept censorship. If Twitter grows in size and profit, it will only put pressure on companies like Facebook, which continue to undermine their product through censorship. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. It should be noted that it has a mask Has already expressed a desire To have less advertising and really more revenue from the subscription. Not only will this be more aesthetically pleasing, it can also protect the site from the inevitable cancellation campaign.
5. Protect against alternative government censorship.
As the likelihood of buying the mask from Twitter increased, there was a significant shift in the views of pro-censorship figures. Hillary Clinton, long regarded as an enemy of freedom of expression values, Went to Twitter Calls on the EU to swiftly pass a digital services law in Europe to be censored “before it’s too late”. This timeline seems to be masked, when the public will suddenly have an alternative to open expression for a time-bound alliance of censorship among social media companies. Because figures like Clinton can not count on the company’s successors for censorship Return to good old government censorship. If the DSA is approved, they hope to force Twitter to resume censorship – a warning repeated by EU officials this week. Congress must act to expose such an attack on American companies seeking to revive the values of free speech.
At the same time, the UK is enforcing its online safety law, and more recently Mask was summoned to parliament To respond to his troubling offer to restore freedom of expression on social media. The British are reassuring citizens that they will “remain calm and censor” despite the mask’s commitment. If the mask does not censor users, it threatens to take ten percent of the company’s profits. The mask should provide firewalls or seal systems for countries that are subject to censorship. These systems should send tweets with the warning that these users are subject to national censorship standards, while protecting American users from reducing their freedom of expression to a lower common denominator.
These challenges are difficult but insignificant compared to reinventing space travel. The greatest asset that Mask brings beyond a deep pocket and a deep belief in freedom of expression on Twitter is his legendary creativity. He tends to focus on one horizon instead of the obstacles or opponents in front of him. Freedom of expression is still a horizontal ideal, but it can be achieved by someone with unwavering commitment and creativity. This could be the ultimate “moonshine” for the mask to restore freedom of expression on the Internet.